Paywall Parity/Guidelines
Run a free audit

Start here

  • Overview
  • Quickstart
  • Safety model

Concepts

  • Store baselines
  • Parity targets
  • Strategies
  • Confidence
  • Drift
  • Protected markets

Workflows

  • Connect a store
  • Review recommendations
  • Stage and publish

Reference

  • Formulas
  • Error codes

Integrations

  • Google Play
  • Apple App Store
  • Revenue signals

Trust and operations

  • Credential custody
  • Methodology

Concepts

Strategies

The three strategy presets, the exact intensities and bounds behind each, and how to choose between them.

Shipped2 min readReviewed 2026-09-21Markdown

On this page

  • The presets
  • What each one means in practice
  • Reading the maximum ratio
  • Choosing
  • Custom strategies

A strategy is how far you are willing to follow purchasing-power data. It sets the dampening intensity for each economic input and the bounds the combined factor is clamped to.

Changing the strategy recalculates every market immediately. Nothing is written; the matrix simply shows a different set of targets.

The presets

ConservativeBalancedGrowth
PPP intensity0.350.650.90
Income intensity0.100.200.30
Price-level intensity0.100.150.20
Minimum price ratio0.700.450.25
Maximum price ratio1.201.201.10

Intensity is the weight given to a factor: 0 ignores it, 1 applies it in full. See Parity targets for the dampening arithmetic.

What each one means in practice

Conservative floors prices at 70% of the converted base. It follows PPP only slightly, so targets stay close to a straight currency conversion. Choose it when your product has strong brand pricing, when you are nervous about existing subscribers, or as a first move before you have any outcome evidence.

Balanced is the default. It follows PPP substantially while leaving a floor at 45%, which keeps the poorest markets from collapsing to a price that cannot sustain support costs. For most catalogues this is the one to reason from.

Growth follows PPP nearly in full and allows prices down to 25% of the converted base. It maximizes addressable audience in low-income markets and gives up the most revenue per payer. Its maximum ratio is lower than the others (1.10 rather than 1.20) — it is a strategy for expanding reach downward, not for charging more in rich markets.

Reading the maximum ratio

All three strategies cap at or below 1.20. Paywall Parity will not recommend charging more than 20% above your converted base price in any market, whatever the data says.

A market that pins to the ceiling is nearly always a data artifact rather than a genuine recommendation to charge more. See Protected markets.

Choosing

Compare the three across your actual catalogue rather than reasoning about them abstractly. Switch strategies in the matrix and watch which markets move.

If a market's target is roughly the same under all three, the recommendation is robust. If it swings hard, the economic inputs for that market are doing all the work and you should check its confidence score before acting on it.

Custom strategies

The configuration type allows a custom strategy with arbitrary intensities and bounds, but no interface exposes it yet. Today the three presets are the whole set.

PreviousParity targetsNextConfidence

On this page

  • The presets
  • What each one means in practice
  • Reading the maximum ratio
  • Choosing
  • Custom strategies